When politicians voice their opposition to something that enhanced the greater good because it might "hurt business" or "will cost jobs" I often wonder why their opponents don't chime in with something positive about businesses by claiming that their owners and managers have certainly proven they are smart enough to make adjustments without all that predicted damage. If it's truly not possible, then the voiced opposition is really all about unconditional protection for unqualified or lazy owners and managers who likely don't care about their employees anyway, only how much money can be extracted from them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment